|
|
Post by lisunken on Nov 26, 2014 20:43:13 GMT -6
THE UNITED CORPORATIONS ASSOCIATION OF DUELING COMMISSION UNIFIED RULES OF DUELING NOVEMBER 26,2014. Rule 1. The Caption whom offense individual Caption or Corporation requires to apologizes. If apologizes is received by the injured party, The matter is settled. Rule 2. If a doubt exist who gave the first offense, the decision rests with the Commission; if the Commission decide if require dueling. Rule 3. If dueling required, It to be public noticed. The offender have a second change to apologizes before duel. Rule 4. The challenger has the right to choose the ship power for the duel and the challenged to location and time. Rule 5. The challenger and challenged will provided screen shot of the duel to the commission. Rule 6. After the dueling the issues is closed for both parties and cannot be brought up in the future. Lisunken Acting Dueling Commission |
|
|
|
Post by sargas on Nov 26, 2014 21:08:19 GMT -6
THE UNITED CORPORATIONS ASSOCIATION OF DUELING COMMISSION UNIFIED RULES OF DUELING NOVEMBER 26,2014. Rule 1. The Caption whom offense individual Caption or Corporation requires to apologizes. If apologizes is received by the injured party, The matter is settled. Rule 2. If a doubt exist who gave the first offense, the decision rests with the Commission; if the Commission decide if require dueling. Rule 3. If dueling required, It to be public noticed. The offender have a second change to apologizes before duel. Rule 4. The challenger has the right to choose the ship power for the duel and the challenged to location and time. Rule 5. The challenger and challenged will provided screen shot of the duel to the commission. Rule 6. After the dueling the issues is closed for both parties and cannot be brought up in the future. Lisunken Acting Dueling Commission Rule 2. What commission? Has a 'Dueling Commission' been established? This entity needs to be discussed and approved before rules are drafted that will empower a Commission. Rule 4: Traditionally, the challenged party chooses the weapon and the challenger chooses the place and time (or the place and time needs to be set by the 'commission'). |
|
|
|
Post by virgil on Nov 27, 2014 0:13:12 GMT -6
THE UNITED CORPORATIONS ASSOCIATION OF DUELING COMMISSION UNIFIED RULES OF DUELING NOVEMBER 26,2014. Rule 1. The Caption whom offense individual Caption or Corporation requires to apologizes. If apologizes is received by the injured party, The matter is settled. Rule 2. If a doubt exist who gave the first offense, the decision rests with the Commission; if the Commission decide if require dueling. Rule 3. If dueling required, It to be public noticed. The offender have a second change to apologizes before duel. Rule 4. The challenger has the right to choose the ship power for the duel and the challenged to location and time. Rule 5. The challenger and challenged will provided screen shot of the duel to the commission. Rule 6. After the dueling the issues is closed for both parties and cannot be brought up in the future. Lisunken Acting Dueling Commission Rule 2. What commission? Has a 'Dueling Commission' been established? This entity needs to be discussed and approved before rules are drafted that will empower a Commission. Rule 4: Traditionally, the challenged party chooses the weapon and the challenger chooses the place and time (or the place and time needs to be set by the 'commission'). Rule 2: Agree with sargas.... Instead of a Commission, this can probably just be decided by the leaders of each Corp. It's a relatively small group. I would say a simple majority can decide if a duel is needed. Rule 4: I would agree that the challenged party can decide the ship power. That way, a larger challenger can't bully a smaller player. The challenger could then decide where and when... with the exception that an established base of either Corp cannot be the chosen location. Other than those two, I agree with all of these. |
|
|
|
Post by lisunken on Nov 30, 2014 20:41:46 GMT -6
any more input to this dueling rules?
|
|
|
|
Post by Rostinius Maximus on Nov 30, 2014 22:06:08 GMT -6
I'm with Virgil and Sargas. Nice job lisunken  |
|
|
|
Post by lisunken on Dec 1, 2014 18:37:44 GMT -6
I will reverse the wording and hope jam add his input for final vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by sargas on Dec 2, 2014 20:00:36 GMT -6
It's still not ready for a final vote.
Why do you want to 'duel' anyway?
This is going way beyond what I (and others) expected from this charter.
We do not govern, we only do that which is civilized among ourselves.
If you feel a need to 'duel' me, send me your second. Do not try to set up a law allowing 'sanctioned dueling'. It will be voted nae from the EoS.
And, when and if the vote for 'sanctioned dueling' is put to the test, EoS will vote NO.
|
|
|
|
Post by lisunken on Dec 2, 2014 20:12:36 GMT -6
lol I wish this game you can get a second to fight for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by sargas on Dec 2, 2014 20:14:28 GMT -6
The second doesn't fight, he is just the 'agent' for the dueling entity.
|
|
|
|
Post by virgil on Dec 4, 2014 13:50:18 GMT -6
It's still not ready for a final vote. Why do you want to 'duel' anyway? This is going way beyond what I (and others) expected from this charter. We do not govern, we only do that which is civilized among ourselves. If you feel a need to 'duel' me, send me your second. Do not try to set up a law allowing 'sanctioned dueling'. It will be voted nae from the EoS. And, when and if the vote for 'sanctioned dueling' is put to the test, EoS will vote NO. These very arguments were raised when JJL was vigorously pushing for the right to shoot whoever he wanted even if they joined. Rostin and myself, IIRC, made arguments in favor of nonviolence. "We do not govern, we only do that which is civilized among ourselves." I made this argument, almost verbatim, in the deepest part of that messy argument between JJL and Joolz and elements of SPQNR, when we decided we had the right to recruit jake/nero without the input of the UC. It was rejected, and never revisited, so I did not consider that others might feel the same way... but hearing you say it now, would you then agree that there should be NO sanctioned violence between members of the UC, under any conditions? All of this about private wars and dueling was to appease JJL; you know Rostin and myself would be more than happy to outlaw all duels and private skirmishes.... |
|
|
|
Post by sargas on Dec 4, 2014 15:13:19 GMT -6
Yes, virgil, that is how the Empire wishes it to be.
As long as any hostility remains only verbal, it is acceptable.
There will be no physical hostile interaction among members!
Period!
End of topic!
That is one of the founding reasons we started this thing we started here.
(edit because:
That may well be where I heard it. I will admit using other people's witticisms as my own (all jokers do, after all). If it makes me seem smart and/or funny, then good; I fooled another one.)...giggle...
...giggle...
|
|
|
|
Post by virgil on Dec 8, 2014 14:10:11 GMT -6
Yes, virgil, that is how the Empire wishes it to be. As long as any hostility remains only verbal, it is acceptable. There will be no physical hostile interaction among members! Period! End of topic! That is one of the founding reasons we started this thing we started here. Music to my ears (well, music to my eyes, I suppose)(edit because: That may well be where I heard it. I will admit using other people's witticisms as my own (all jokers do, after all). If it makes me seem smart and/or funny, then good; I fooled another one.)...giggle... ...giggle...
I believe my words were that this was not a governing body, so much as a gentleman's agreement. Your wording is yours alone! I'm merely excited to see the sentiment echoed. |
|
|
|
Post by Rostinius Maximus on Mar 12, 2015 23:22:04 GMT -6
Did this ever get ratified? I cannot seem to recall
|
|
|
|
Post by sargas on Mar 13, 2015 8:31:14 GMT -6
no, it was left on the table after JJL left due to an apparent lack of interest.
If you wish to re-open this topic, please be advised that the EoS will vote nay.
|
|
